Six
Revolooshunairy
Ideeas

 

 

 

THE FIFTH
MILENIUM

     


THE CIRCLE OF THE TWO TRUTHS

Above is the ancient Chinese figure that represents the forces of the Yin and Yang. According to traditional Chinese cosmology, these two principles interact to produce everything that comes into existence. This classic symbol can also be used to illustrate the relationship between scientific truth and spiritual truth.

The dark side, the Yin, can represent scientific truth and the light side, the Yang, spiritual truth. These continually swirling forces make up the whole but they remain forever separate with a clear boundary maintained between. And so it is with people and their search for scientific and spiritual truth. These two quests define the whole person, and indeed, the human species. The degree to which we have a balanced life is the extent to which these two forces are in balance with neither principle dominating at the expense of the other.

When it comes to defining what is meant by scientific truth and spiritual truth, we have an easier time with the scientific. We know the scientific to be rational, objective, and open to public evaluation. Let us then say that the spiritual is non-rational (not the same as irrational), subjective, and private. The individual is the authority on his/her spiritual life instead of the public. The spiritual is whatever works to give you a sense of awe, make you feel transported out of the everyday routine and make you feel connected to something transcendent. It can be as refined as the inspiration from a sunset or visiting an art museum, or as plebeian as being swept along in the waves of communal feelings at a sporting event. It does not have to be "religious", involving belief in a god or gods and the supernatural, although it can be.

The "revolutionary" implication:
Contrary to the teaching and preaching of those with financial interests in religious power and organization, there is no right or wrong when it comes to the spiritual. The spiritual is not about right and wrong. Its mystery and beauty are in another realm beyond the earthly concerns of right and wrong. Unless your spiritual pursuits lead to anti-social behavior, they are none of the public's business. Another's spiritual interests may not be yours, but that must be understood to be just a matter of taste, nothing more. We all have a spiritual life to a greater or lesser extent just as we all have a sexual life. No one, particularly religious authorities, has the right to presume to judge the validity of another's spiritual beliefs. No one. To do so is rude, hurtful, and hateful and must not be tolerated.

It is in the spiritual area, more than any other, where the Golden Rule applies in that we should respect other people's spiritual quest as we would have them respect ours. Said in a more personal way, I don't want your public declaration of love, it is too patronizing, or your tolerance, it is too begrudging. I want, indeed I demand, the respect for my spiritual quest which I freely give to you for yours. If we keep our spiritual lives private, where they belong, and do not take them to the street, then conflict will not arise.

Morality, which is about what the community, state, nation, or world considers right or wrong, cannot then, have any basis in anyone's spiritual beliefs, or revealed "truth". Morality is secular. It is a societal, people to people concern that must be based on reason. Those who would make it a people to God concern are only after power as God's anointed authority who can give the law because God has revealed to them the truth. This concept is, of course, contrary to the usual teachings of the three major western religions, but until this concept is widely accepted, we will never have civil harmony nor world peace.

You can read further about the Circle of the Two Truths, along with five other "revolutionary ideas" in the book, 4000, THE FIFTH MILENIUM, Six Revolooshunairy Iedeeas, available from Aster Esprit Press, 16265 Dahlgren Road, King George, VA 22485, $14.95, includes shipping.

     
Last Updated 02/26/2005

 (C) 1995-2005 Timothy Travis

E-mail the Author